A regularly updated version of this guide can be found here.
I teach atÂ the third-most expensive school in the country, where I regularly persuade students that they should major or minor in philosophy. For many students, this is a value question, and as I like to put it, there’s a difference here between the value of a philosophy education and its price. Specifically, it’s not clear to me that it ought to cost $200,000 to get a bachelor’s degree in philosophy… but I do think it’s worth it.
As a result of this tension,Â the current crisis in the humanities has very personal implications for me. In the UK,Â whole departments are being cut, while the US continues to squeeze the humanities even when they are massively popular and profitable. AsÂ I’ve been trying toÂ argue, this was always entailed by the growing rent-seeking class of administrators who we have apparently hired so that we can be saved the labor needed to fire us. Frankly, I suspect we’ve had this coming for a couple ofÂ millenniaÂ now: didn’t Socrates make his name undermining the paid-teaching models of the Sophists?
Iain PearsÂ writes critically of this trend but the upshot is actually somewhat conservative:
The combination of artificially-induced market forces and government disdain for the humanities as economically non-productive will shrink arts subjects into a ghetto where they will become increasingly studied by those who can afford to pay, at institutions which can afford to charge
I call that conservative because the humanities will again be relegated to their role in signaling status, as only richer Britons or Americans will be able to afford the tuition fees at top schools where the humanities are still taught.
Caught in the middle of this, I think we have two options: we can criticize and decry this course of events in hopes of changing it, or we can begin preparing for a time when humanities instruction is less accessible than it has been over the past half-century. In fact, we should do both, but today I want to focus on preparation.
So, here’s what I have in mind: a free syllabus in philosophy for all those students who can’t afford to attend one of the elite schools that still teaches philosophy in a decade.
Here’s how it works: combine the free online offerings of MIT’s Open Courseware, Academic Earth, Itunes U, and Youtube with other free web resources that would suffice to supply what could once only be gained by taking out student loans.
Check it out!
- Introduction to Philosophy
Start withÂ Oxford’s Peter Millican at Itunes U.
- Introduction to Ethics and Political Philosophy
Michael Sandel’sÂ Justice course has drawn tens of thousands of Harvard students and focuses on themes and problems in the good life and the good society. Steven B. Smith offers a historical approach at Yale onÂ Academic Earth. Explore special topics the BBC’sÂ Ethics Bites or spend a semester with Berkley’s Michael Nagler considering the case forÂ Nonviolence.
- Epistemology and Metaphysics
I haven’t been able to find an introductory course just on metaphysics, but how about John Searle’s lectures on theÂ Philosophy of Mind?Â Alternatively, take a look at this course on the ethics and metaphysics ofÂ Death by Yale’s Shelly Kagan.
Kent State’s Jeffrey Wattles offers anÂ Introduction.
Now, self-regard prevents me from really believing that the education available online is better than the one you can get in my classroom, but I’m not so arrogant to think that I’m a better lecturer than Michael Sandel. Notable is what’s lost when all you have are these kinds of courses: you lose feedback and the interrogative experience of a seminar room, you lose the cohort of fellow students who will stay up late hashing out a passage from Aristotle, you lose theÂ synchronicityÂ of associations between very different courses taken simultaneously, and you lose the assessment and professionalization that a professor’s comments and counseling supply. What makes my classroom work is the seminar-style I learned as an undergraduate at Bard College, and which I try to foster at George Washington. That’s the practice of philosophy as a liberal art, a technique for free citizens to inquire together into matters of fundamental concern. You can’t learn theÂ habitusÂ of philosophy from an online video.
- Special Topics
So far, the courses available online might supply the first two years of a philosophy degree. A disciplined person pursing this syllabus would have a good sense of the overall discipline, but could not be said to have “majored” in philosophy, because the free university offerings become a bit sparser at the advanced level. Courses at this level become specialized, focusing on epochs, figures, problems, and themes. Plus, this is the stage when we start really pushing students to see which ones have potential to become professional scholars, if not in philosophy than in a proximate academic discipline or as lawyers. That means it’s a much more interactive and much more textual education, and it may be less easily-suppled online.
However, it’s always possible glean specific insights and avenues for research fromÂ Philosophy Bites or the Guardian’sÂ How to Believe series. You can dig deeper into any topic using theÂ Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Herbert Dreyfus takes students throughÂ Heidegger’s Being and Time (continued here), which you can supplement with Simon Critchley’sÂ series in the Guardian.Â Also at the Guardian, Mark Vernon blogsÂ The Platonic Dialogues, and in the same vein, Chris Long offersÂ a series of interviews on Socratic Political themes. (More from the Guardian:Â Kierkegaard,Â Nietzsche,Â Hume,Wittgenstein, andÂ Hobbes.)
For a whileÂ Susan Stuart’s lectures on Kant’s epistemology offered a pretty thorough guide toÂ The Critique of Pure Reason,Â but they’ve been removed. Perhaps they’ll be back. I wouldn’t ask DIY-ers to brave the first Critique without a guide, but this is the point when a good library or bookstore might supply the missing manual.
- Interaction and Feedback
The quickest way to get feedback on an idea or argument is to start blogging about it. A really ambitious DIY student could recruit a cohort of fellow DIY-ers to work with her.Â Start aÂ WordPress orÂ Blogger blog and join a community likeÂ Big Big Question,Â Ephilosopher,Â Metafilter, orÂ Less Wrong. Start writing, reading, responding, and linking, and the commentary will come. Some of it will be critical, some helpful, some mean, but you’ll learn and make connections, develop insights andÂ obsessions, just like a traditional student.
If all the instruction is happening online, and all the grading is is Bangalore, who would want to be a “professional” philosopher?Â With the UK cutting budgets and whole departments, and humanities instruction increasingly done by adjuncts and graduate students rather than tenure/tenure-track faculty, it appears that there may soon be fewer opportunities for philosophy instruction that there were previously.
So maybe we could forgo professionalization… except that it seems to me that an amateur philosophy student has only learned enough to be dangerous, not enough to be useful. So in that sense, my free syllabus is a failure: you can get a philosophical education for free, online, but it takes bit more than that to garner the benefits of studying philosophy. (But hopefully not $200,000 more….) If this page whets your whistle, though… well, remind me to tell you about Socrates’ art of matchmaking and midwifery when you sign up for my course. 🙂
If we love our discipline as much as the paycheck and status it promises, we have to work to combat the exclusivity of an examined life available onlyÂ to those who can pay. If the internet is not yet able to take over our duties… I guess we’re going to have to fight.