<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>anotherpanacea &#187; focus</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anotherpanacea.com/tag/focus/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com</link>
	<description>Cure-alls and Remedies</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 15:20:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Our Uncharitable Agricultural Subsidies</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2008/02/our-uncharitable-agricultural-subsidies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2008/02/our-uncharitable-agricultural-subsidies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 19:45:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[charity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discussions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[give]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globalization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nee]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anotherpanacea.com/2008/02/02/our-uncharitable-agricultural-subsidies/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discussions of inequality usually focus on charity: what can we give or do for those in need? However, as the breakdown of last year&#8217;s WTO discussions demonstrates, most poor countries would much prefer fair dealing and equal opportunities to trade rather than handouts, especially when those handouts come in the form of &#8216;dumped&#8217; surpluses created [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Discussions of inequality usually focus on charity: what can we give or do for those in need? However, as <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2006/jul/24/wto.politics">the breakdown of last year&#8217;s WTO discussions demonstrates</a>, most poor countries would much prefer fair dealing and equal opportunities to trade rather than handouts, especially when those handouts come in the form of <a href="http://www.oxfamamerica.org/whatwedo/campaigns/agriculture/what-you-need-to-know">&#8216;dumped&#8217; surpluses created through our massive agricultural subsidies</a>. So we should welcome <a href="http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/24/business/trade.php">a new round of Doha trade talks</a>, and charitably <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/01/AR2006070100962.html">forgo subsidizing our own farmers</a> at <a href="http://www.globalpolicy.org/socecon/trade/subsidies/index.htm">the expense of agriculture around the world</a>. The notion that charity always involves such trade-offs is the really hard point to digest. Worse still, this kind of charity might also be <a href="http://www.reason.com/news/show/36207.html">the best way to pursue our own self-interest</a>. Uh oh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2008/02/our-uncharitable-agricultural-subsidies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s new in civil rights?</title>
		<link>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2006/07/whats-new-in-civil-rights/</link>
		<comments>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2006/07/whats-new-in-civil-rights/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Jul 2006 18:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[civil]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fewer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[offices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shifted]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anotherpanacea.com/wordpress/2006/07/25/whats-new-in-civil-rights/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Justice under Bush: the DOJ&#8217;s Civil Rights Division has shifted its focus. New hiring policies. New cases. Fewer offices. via]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Justice under Bush: the DOJ&#8217;s Civil Rights Division has shifted its focus.</p>
<p>New <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/23/civil_rights_hiring_shifted_in_bush_era/">hiring policies</a>.</p>
<p>New <a href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/07/23/with_new_faces_new_types_of_cases/">cases</a>.</p>
<p>Fewer <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/25/AR2005052501866_pf.html">offices</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.metafilter.com/mefi/53216">via</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anotherpanacea.com/2006/07/whats-new-in-civil-rights/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
