Lamont’s win and campaign finance

Still getting the bugs squared away here, and I lost a long post on Lamont’s win in Connecticut. The short version:

1. Beware a Republican win against a split “Democratic” ticket.

2. Lamont spent less money than Lieberman, so money doesn’t always unseat incumbents.

3. Speech beat Lieberman, not finances. We should re-separate the two. Can you hear me, Supreme Court?

Second Opinions